Home >
Review on the ETH Loss Since Ethereum EIP-1559

Review on the ETH Loss Since Ethereum EIP-1559

Since the implementation of EIP-1559 in early August, the Ethereum network has been consuming ETH at an alarming rate. Since then, a portion of the fees has been continuously burned, thus removing a major portion of the digital asset from the marketplace. It was decided to implement this hard fork in order to battle the inflationary nature of Ethereum, and it has proven to be successful since many blocks have been deflationary since the hard fork was done.

1 Million ETH Clocks Have Been Burned

The quantity of ETH burned has increased in tandem with the increase in network costs. Transaction costs on Ethereum have skyrocketed as a result of increased network utilization, and since EIP-1559 was deployed to burn a third of all fees, a greater number of ETH has been regularly removed from circulation. EIP-1559 is currently being reviewed. The number had swiftly surpassed one million ETH, and by ten million, the community's attention had turned to the one million-ETH milestone..

Ethereum reached this milestone on Wednesday, when the total quantity of ETH burned on the network surpassed 1 million for the first time. It only took a little more than three months to reach this milestone, and as the amount of fuel burned on the network increases, it may likely take even less time to reach the 2 million level.

At the current price of ETH, the total amount of ETH that has been burned amounts to more than $4.2 billion. In the absence of EIP-1559, the entirety of this volume would have entered the circulation, increasing the total amount of circulating ETH and adding to the inflationary character of the cryptocurrency. However, as a result of the burn, Ethereum is on its way to becoming a true deflationary currency.

The Consequences of the Ethereum Burn

The impact of the ETH burn has been visible throughout the Ethereum network in recent months, even though the cryptocurrency is not entirely deflationary. According to some fascinating statistics, the amount of ETH that is pushed into circulation every mined block has decreased dramatically. Since the hard fork, the net reduction has increased to as much as 67.16 percent of the original amount.

In addition, net issuance has decreased in tandem with net reduction. To date, the net issuance on the Ethereum network has reached 490,400 tokens at the time of writing.

There have been 1,493,739 ETH awards distributed, amounting to slightly more than $6.3 billion in total. While tips on the network have done exceptionally well, with over 200,000 ETH tipped so far, totaling $846 million, there is still room for improvement.

In Comparison To Other Markets, How Has Price Fared?

Since the start of the burn, the price of Ethereum has increased dramatically. Since August, the digital asset has established numerous new records and has gone dangerously near to breaching the $5,000 resistance level. Since then, the asset, along with the rest of the cryptocurrency market, has taken a beating, but it has managed to hold its ground above $4,000 despite bears' attempts to drive the price lower.

Even when the market has not performed as well as expected, the indicators have remained bullish. Analysts predict that the digital asset will reach $5,000 by the end of the year, propelled by the rise of DeFi. In the next years, as more and more investors come to the blockchain in order to profit from this emerging business, Ethereum has a strong chance of reaching this level before the year 2021 ends.

What is the significance of EIP-1559?

There was much hype when EIP-1559 went online on August 5, 2021, as part of the London hardfork, and none of the anticipated problems occurred; either the Ethereum network breaks down because of the failure of miners to perform a hard fork and include EIP-1559 as part of the hard fork. EIP-1559 alters the way the Ethereum network's fee market operates; it provides a new baseFee that is burnt rather than distributed to miners, and as an alternative to setting a gas price, customers can also specify a maximum fee and a priority fee for transactions.

A transaction charge is calculated in EIP-1559 using the following equation, which is expressed in formula form:

A transaction fee equals baseFee plus min(maxFee — baseFee, priorityFee) a transaction fee.

A fee that floats in response to network congestion, with the most recent value (for blockspace) provided via the new JSON RPC method eth fee-History.

PriorityFee (also known as a tip or miner's tip): A fee paid to a block producer in exchange for included the transaction in the block.

Maxfee: The maximum amount of network fees that the user is willing to accept.

EIP-1559 didn't just happen; it was planned and implemented with the goal of resolving some of the most serious issues that were plaguing the Ethereum network. Before we get to that, let us go back to the beginning: What exactly is EIP-1559?

Changes to the Ethereum pricing model are described in detail in EIP-1559 (Ethereum Improvement Proposals 1559), which was proposed by Vitalik Buterin in 2019. As stated by the Bitcoin Foundation, it is a transaction pricing method that incorporates a fixed per-block network charge that is burned, as well as a dynamic block size expansion/contraction mechanism to deal with transitory congestion.

To fully comprehend the foregoing, it is necessary to first examine the Ethereum fee model prior to EIP-1559, which was a straightforward auction process known as a first-price auction. First-price auction models are used to ensure that transactions are picked up by miners. Users who want their transactions picked up by miners must bid for their transactions to be included in a block. This is accomplished by the submission of a gas price they are willing to pay for a certain transaction. In order to select transactions to include in a block, the miners are incentivized to sort them according to the highest gas price, with the most profitable transactions being included first. Users who have lower gas prices will have to wait a long time for their transactions to be included in a block of transactions because of the high demand. As a result, users are frequently forced to overpay in order for their transactions to be included in a block. This is inefficient and does not provide a positive user experience for the user.